If you’re a PhD preparing to move from academia into industry, you’ve probably already heard the advice: “You need a resume, not a CV.” Fair enough. But what does that mean?

For many PhDs, the first instinct is to open their CV, start deleting sections, and try to squeeze years of academic experience into one or two pages. It’s an understandable move. It also misses the bigger issue.

Your academic CV was designed to document your scholarly accomplishments for readers who already speak your language. An industry resume has a different job: it needs to help an employer quickly understand what you can contribute to their organization. So when an industry employer reads a document built for an academic audience, the problem usually isn’t that your experience is irrelevant. It’s that the value of that experience isn’t visible to the person reading it.

So, before you attempt to turn your academic CV into a resume, pause and ask yourself these four questions.

1. Who is my audience?

It sounds obvious, but this is one of the most important questions you can ask.

Your CV was written with academics in mind: faculty members, search committees, grant reviewers, and fellow scholars who understand the context of your work without needing it explained. An industry resume lands in very different hands. A recruiter may be scanning for evidence that you meet the basic requirements. A hiring manager may be trying to determine whether you can solve a specific business problem. And the person reviewing your application may have nothing close to the subject-matter expertise of your dissertation committee.

Add in the technology that increasingly screens applications before a human ever sees them, and it becomes clear why your resume needs to make the relevant parts of your experience easy to find and understand.

Consider the difference between these two statements:

Conducted interdisciplinary research investigating mechanisms of cellular signaling.

versus:

Designed and executed experiments to investigate complex biological processes and analyzed resulting datasets.

Neither is inherently better. But the second makes the candidate’s skills, and what they could bring to a team, visible to a much broader audience.

Before you revise a single line, ask yourself: Who will read this, and what will they need to understand about me?

2. What does this employer value?

One of the most common missteps I see when PhDs transition to industry is starting with the question, “How do I make my CV shorter?” A better question is, “What does this employer need?”

Your CV is a complete record of your academic experience. Your resume should be far more selective, and the job posting is your best guide for what to select. Rather than reading it once and hitting “apply,” treat it as a set of clues. What skills, experiences, and capabilities appear again and again? What problems is this person being hired to solve? Which qualifications seem especially important? The answers reveal what the employer values and the language they use to describe that value.

For example, if a position emphasizes project management, cross-functional collaboration, data analysis, and communication, those concepts should be easy to spot on your resume, as long as they accurately reflect your experience. You don’t need to manufacture experience you don’t have. You do need to make your relevant experience visible.

3. Where is the evidence that I can do the job?

Here’s where your academic experience starts working in your favor.

PhDs often have a tremendous amount of transferable experience. They just don’t always recognize it as such. You may have:

• Managed a multi-year research project
• Trained or supervised students
• Collaborated across disciplines
• Analyzed complex datasets
• Presented findings to different audiences
• Secured funding
• Troubleshot problems when experiments failed
• Managed competing deadlines
• Developed new processes or methodologies

Here’s the shift I want you to make. The question isn’t simply “What have I done?” It’s “Which of the things I’ve done provide evidence that I can do what this employer needs?”

Take a line like “Mentored undergraduate researchers.” On its own, it tells the reader very little. So consider what that experience demonstrates. Did you train people? Delegate responsibilities? Provide feedback? Balance their progress alongside your own deadlines? Help someone develop new skills? Those details are evidence of capabilities that matter far beyond a lab or classroom.

Your goal isn’t to convince an employer that everything you’ve ever done is relevant. It’s to put your strongest evidence front and center.

4. Am I translating my CV or simply shortening it?

This may be the most important question of all, because converting a CV to a resume isn’t an exercise in subtraction. You aren’t creating a CV with fewer pages. You’re creating a different document for a different purpose, which means some of your academic language will need to change.

Think about the difference between “Dissertation research focused on…” and “Led a research project examining…” Or between “Served as a teaching assistant for…” and “Delivered instruction and provided individualized feedback to…”

The goal isn’t to disguise your academic background, and you certainly shouldn’t swap accurate terminology for corporate buzzwords just because they sound more “industry.” (No one needs you to “leverage synergies.”) Instead, ask yourself: How would I describe this experience so that someone outside my field understands what I did and why it matters?

That’s translation, and translation takes more than cutting words.

Turning Your Academic CV into a Resume Starts with a Mindset Shift

Your academic experience hasn’t changed. Your audience has.

That’s the mindset shift I want every PhD to make before they start building an industry resume. You don’t need to minimize your PhD or apologize for being an academic. You don’t need to pretend your research, teaching, and mentoring didn’t happen. You need to communicate the value of that work in a way that makes sense to a new audience.

Your academic CV was designed to answer the question, What has this scholar accomplished? Your industry resume needs to answer a different one: What can this person contribute here?

Once you start thinking about your resume that way, the task becomes less about cutting your CV down to size and more about repackaging your experience with intention. And that’s a much more powerful place to start.

Want more practical career strategies for graduate students and postdocs? Join the Careers in Bloom newsletter. Click here and scroll down to the bottom.